Mammograms Under or Over Diagnosis? (article)
There has been a long debate, since mammograms were put into use in the early 1980s, if they over or under diagnose breast cancer. Now someone has finally decided to take another look at all this data. There are two main parts to this issue: Are small tumors that would never grow into something 'bad' being over diagnosed and over treated? Are too many other tumors missed in mammograms? This group of researchers examined data from 2001 to 2013 and determined that:"The results showed that most overdiagnosis occurred in older patients with biologically favorable, slow-growing tumors."
These tumors are ones that will not become problematic 'go bad' for 15-20 years. These do not need treatment..... In addition they revised their thinking on which tumors were going to become 'problematic' (what a sanitary word for cancer diagnosis).
This is new thinking.
So maybe instead of blindly following what we have been told in the past, we look at what is now known.... This is called progress.
This is the article Mammograms Under or Over Diagnosis? (article) this time, hopefully can benefit for you all. well, see you in other article post.
Title : Mammograms Under or Over Diagnosis? (article)
link : Mammograms Under or Over Diagnosis? (article)
0 Response to "Mammograms Under or Over Diagnosis? (article)"
Post a Comment