Side Effects Vs. Costs (article) - medication costs, side effects, Mesothelioma Cancer 24, In the article you read this time with the title Side Effects Vs. Costs (article), we has prepared this article well for you to read and retrieve information in it. hopefully the contents of this article post we write this you can understand. okay, happy reading.

Side Effects Vs. Costs (article)

This morning an email on the discontinuation of a certain drug which the article says is a good thing because it will save billions of dollars. The drug in question is TKI and is used to treat CML. It works well at putting people in remission but comes with a high financial cost, $147,000 per year and causes many side effects.

This made me think. Which is more important - financial cost or side effects?

I am torn on this one. A drug that costs $147,000 per year is phenomenally expensive. If it was a branded drug on my insurance I would be charged probably 40% of that cost. Could I afford that? Even without pulling out a calculator that would be somewhere north of $50,000 each year. I do not have that kind of money.

I have problems with my high cost medications. I am on several that each cost me over $1000/year - which to me is a lot.

Then there is the side effect issue. I am on medications for the side effects of some of my other medications. I also have to have regular blood work and chest x-rays done to monitor for other side effects. (Sometimes I think I might be better off if I took no medications at all.)

But this is a bit of a conundrum - side effects or costs.
Title : Side Effects Vs. Costs (article)
link : Side Effects Vs. Costs (article)